"minors" and "kids" are also not necessarily the same. Talking about 16-year-old wearers and 11-year-old wearers is very different. I would consider both uses rather questionable, and would say we should not promote either, but putting a belt on an 11-year-old is way more wrong by orders of magnitude.

Also, huge difference between supporting keyholders and supporting wearers. I am pretty sure every time a 13-year-old posts about having been locked without release for years, that is just a crazy person's stupid fantasy, but something about a 17-year-old who can only take off her belt while under her mother's watchful eye is not so far from the truth that she cannot at least be given the benefit of doubt, and she should have access to information about things like her legal rights, emotional support from other people and stategies that allow her to live a happy life within her restrictions if the does not want to fight for her rights.

On the other hand, if someone says he is a dad who wants to lock up his precious princess so she does not spoil her value as a virgin, eff that guy.

I think all is clear.
Obviously a girl can enter and comment on her situation, but if she is young, the thread will be closed after a few tips.
A father with the idea of ​​forcing his young daughter will obviously be treated equally.
The forum cannot be a reservoir for these people.
Users cannot encourage the sexualization of childhood either.

    Ines
    I totally agree with you and thank you for the clarification.

    Ines changed the title to New politics .

    Joh If you point it out every time when it arise that this is against the law and harassment we may change there view and they don't do it.

    It's child pornography that is against the law, and topics which could loosely be considered related to sex.
    When I was underage I needed to keep my chastity comfortable and clean and that was consensual and not against the law. But the people who write stories on here seem to focus in an erotic context and that IS against the law and not right to do.

    Parents in countries where Female Genital Mutilation is practiced should obviously choose chastity is they wish but that does NOT require pictures or some erotic fantasy novel.

      At the end of the day, anything that involves a minor's genitalia and interfering in their sex life is always going to be rather subjective (unless it is obvious the writer is getting off to it and/or expects the readers to do so). I doubt there is a clear answer across jurisdictions, and even within a jurisdiction different judges may draw different lines.

      I would say that care should generally be taken to stay away from erotic writing though. If we invite minors (even 17-year-olds) to discuss sexual matters, erotic content, even if the people whom it is about are above 21, might be i bad taste.

      And then there are the tons of edge cases. When is it erotic to discuss how a lack of sexual relief affects your life, and stuff like that.

      • Ines replied to this.

        youdontknowme
        At the end, as Megan rightly, we want avoid:
        1- Weird fantasies of almost sadistic nature. The criteria is the experience of moderators.
        2- Sexualization of kids, at certain ages it is absolutely out of discussion that a chastity belt is out of sight. If someone comes here to talk about such ideas, the only answer will be of moderation.

        I believe that outside these red lines there is enough room for a lot of things.

        youdontknowme If we invite minors (even 17-year-olds) to discuss sexual matters, erotic content, even if the people whom it is about are above 21, might be i bad taste.

        we should avoid sexualizing those threads. It is not only of bad taste but also forbidden for moderation.

        Ines changed the title to Explaining rules .

        Joh I really like is to discussion with you your view on all the different topics as long as it is in a respectful and not offending way. It would be a pity if it were no longer possible for sensitive issues.

        of course i agree, and i can make it even more complicated. i am 18 and you can write openly with me, but if my 16 year old girlfriend is reading along, should i ban her from the room? it's all a bit illogical (my opinion).

        Joh Difficult and I see your point. The best will be to find out why and which goal they have.

        that's what i try to do, i continue to try to help everyone individually, no matter what gender, role or age. 🙂

        Ines Obviously a girl can enter and comment on her situation, but if she is young, the thread will be closed after a few tips.

        what do you mean by young? that is the crucial point.
        If I were to write that I'm 16 or that I'm 20, firstly no one would be able to check it because we're an anonymous forum and secondly it wouldn't change my situation.

        I think it would be more important to approach the matter with more sensitivity and to try to put ourselves in the girls' shoes. I agree with you that clear rules are needed, but please ones that are also controllable.

          Angelina of course i agree, and i can make it even more complicated. i am 18 and you can write openly with me, but if my 16 year old girlfriend is reading along, should i ban her from the room? it's all a bit illogical (my opinion).

          It is quite different, everyone in private life can do freely, here, in the forum, no. I did not sexualized any post here.

          Angelina would be able to check it because we're an anonymous forum

          We can not allow that a user who is sayin is 13 years old starts to talk about anal sex, for example.

          Angelina but please ones that are also controllable.

          These are controllable, I think.

            Angelina of course i agree, and i can make it even more complicated. i am 18 and you can write openly with me, but if my 16 year old girlfriend is reading along, should i ban her from the room? it's all a bit illogical (my opinion).

            No, this is not reasonable. Maybe a solution would be glasses which detect not for her age appropriated sentences and turned black so she can't read it. 😮 🤣

            Angelina I think it would be more important to approach the matter with more sensitivity and to try to put ourselves in the girls' shoes. I agree with you that clear rules are needed, but please ones that are also controllable.

            Good point. We can control it only if an age verification would be installed. But it would not prevent minors from reading the posting as long as the forum is freely accessible.
            I believe to have the guideline and be careful what we write is a good way to keep our forum on a good track.

              Ines It is quite different, everyone in private life can do freely, here, in the forum, no.

              I understood that, I formulated it deliberately provocatively

              Ines We can not allow that a user who is sayin is 13 years old starts to talk about anal sex, for example.

              what if it is based on a real experience. it is of course very unlikely, but not impossible or?

              Ines These are controllable, I think.

              ok, i will see

              Joh Maybe a solution would be glasses which detect not for her age appropriated sentences and turned black so she can't read it. 😮 🤣

              🤣

              Joh We can control it only if an age verification would be installed.

              the question would be how this works without having to enter personal data.

              • Ines replied to this.

                Angelina what if it is based on a real experience. it is of course very unlikely, but not impossible or?

                The she can go to another place, but such themes will be closed in this forum.

                I know that maybe it is a bit hard, but we should the forum the less sexualizedsexualized as possible. I know I am asking an effort to the users, but it is for good reason.

                  Ines I know that maybe it is a bit hard, but we should the forum the less sexualizedsexualized as possible. I know I am asking an effort to the users, but it is for good reason.

                  I accept that and will try to follow your request, I just want to explain why I think some rules are correct in principle, but wrong in their implementation

                  • Ines replied to this.

                    Angelina
                    We do not have room for wrong implementation.
                    We are here to talk and discuss about chastity belts, but topics with excessive sexual load will be closed.
                    We have to maintain a happy environment, and if this keep await some perverts of opening accounts here, then, all is worth it.

                      Ines We are here to talk and discuss about chastity belts, but topics with excessive sexual load will be closed.
                      We have to maintain a happy environment, and if this keep await some perverts of opening accounts here,

                      i agree 100% with this part, i also think we should continue to keep the forum clean

                      Ines We do not have room for wrong implementation.

                      Ines then, all is worth it.

                      i don't agree with this part at the moment, but i will see how it will look in practice. i only ask for sensitivity when making decisions

                      • Ines replied to this.

                        Angelina i only ask for sensitivity when making decisions

                        I think that sensivity and manners are a constant in moderation action here.

                          Ines I think that sensivity and manners are a constant in moderation action here.

                          i have that feeling too, but it can just slip away pretty quickly and by that i mean both in one direction and in the other