Equipment in public showers or dressing rooms (e.g. gyms)

Sara2001 The Last time I went to a public pool There were separate showers for each sex. The purpose is to wash thoroughly beforehand and if there are no cubicles it means that everyone can see when I take off my baders. Now it's up to each individual to look at me explicitly or not. Out of consideration and because it is decent, one should not do it. When I wear a CB now, I don't expect the others to see at me like usually.

Joh When I wear a CB now, I don't expect the others to see at me like usually.

I still think that's not the right way to see it, especially if minors are around.

Sara2001

Sara2001 I still think that's not the right way to see it, especially if minors are around.

It is Always dificult when minors are around. Them it is better Not to drop your baders. Better is to wash yourself with it in.

Joh It is Always dificult when minors are around. Them it is better Not to drop your baders. Better is to wash yourself with it in.

That's a good solution when it hides your equipment.

Kaja I do it the same way.
But I wanted to point out If you see a problem with minors it is Independent from a CB.

Joh Problem with minnors?

What you mean?

Underage never excited me

Kaja Nonono
I mean If They think it is Not a good behavior to get nacked If underage in the same showers room.

@"Kaja"#p79088Yes. But as you wrote some girls in puberty are shy. Some people keep it to be shy with stranges.

In my opinion, the problem is more ethical than content.
That is, a person derives pleasure from the involuntary participation of others.
I will give a silly example of usual on mine , if a person who generates sexual pleasure shows an apple. Is it moral that I get pleasure from showing that apple without the knowledge of the other party?
I do not see anything wrong with a belt in a locker room, but if the person wearing it does it out of exhibitionism, I think that, although the situation is the same, the moral dilemma is different

Ines 100% this. There is nothing wrong with nudity in places where nudity is expected (and if you prefer nudity to be limited to same-sex situations, most places have separate changing/washing areas). Getting clean in the shower is not a form of sexual activity, so there is nothing wrong with doing it in front of minors and/or strangers, especially if that is the norm for places like this (and pool locker rooms frequently expect you to take of your underwear before putting on your swimwear, and in many places also expect you to shower naked).

Exposure play, i.e. doing it because it feels sexy to be seen, is different. Though the situation is the same, i.e. you are naked in front of a bunch of other people in a situation where it is perfectly acceptable to be naked in front of those people, the person's motivations are different. If they are deliberately trying to be seen for sexual pleasure, that means that they are deriving sexual pleasure from other people who never agreed to provide sexual pleasure to them. That is not something that you should do with strangers, and if there are minors in the crowd, even worse.

Now, how does a chastity device factor into this. If you use it as a sex toy, as Kaja and her boyfriend do, then it just exacerbates this. If you just had not had an opportunity to take it off, it is a mixed bag, might be a good idea to try hiding it. If you are deliberately going out in the device to be seen in it though, that is bad behavior.

If on the other hand you are using it as part of a 24/7 lifestyle (ignoring the distinction between power exchange with a partner versus using it as an aid to live a life free of masturbation and/or adultery for now), I feel you can be a bit more daring and wear it matter-of-fact-ly, but keep in mind that for strangers, it would still be indistinguishable from a sex toy, so I would still say do not draw attention to it; drawing strangers' attention to those devices is at least as bad as drawing it to your genitalia.

youdontknowme
Agree too.

youdontknowme
To put it in a nutshell, whether it is acceptable or not is solely how the wearer feels about it. And this is independent of whether anyone else knows this or not.

This raises the question of whether it is morally wrong for me to see a beautiful woman (in my eyes) on the street, go home and have sex with my wife. I'm sure the woman doesn't agree with what it has triggered in me without being asked. But did she know about it? No.
Does she feel abused? No.

In both cases it is a philosophical consideration of something that is not there as long as no one knows what is going on in the head.

Joh It hides Not only your Equipment, If you wear one. You will then not make your private parts visible. So if we are talking about prudent behaviour in the presence of minors, this is the right thing to do. Anyway If you wear one or Not.

I don't think that prudeness is the main reason. A normal naked body is normal in Germany, a person in a chastity device is not.

I concur with Joh here, if we take normality as the baseline of acceptability, that would hamper social progress; and in this case I am sure progress in term of public acceptance of belts would be great as it would reduce the restrictions in activities that 24/7 wearers have to endure. But those wearers who dare to push the envelope need to be aware that they are pushing the envelope and not make thing worse by trying to draw excessive attention to their out-of-the-norm behavior, and by behaving in a manner that stands for peaceful coexistence, rather than imposing your lifestyle onto others.

Sara2001 I don't think that prudeness is the main reason. A normal naked body is normal in Germany, a person in a chastity device is not.

Same here, for that I am cautious even if I do not find myself often in the situation.