Angelina i am very divided on this. we should punish forced chastity, but encourage voluntary chastity, that would be the point of a CB friendly culture. in the example of my fictitious daughter, i also think of her unintentionally losing her virginity at 15, just because she was not allowed to wear a belt. i think as long as it is on a voluntary basis, the state should stay out of family matters.
The difficulty with this is how easily something can be disguised as voluntary. I mean, you yourself say you are locked up against your will, yet you would not throw your father under the bus to get free.
I mean, I totally agree with you, people voluntarily choosing to protect themselves from their sexual urges should get all the help we can provide, but the sad fact is that we quickly run into complex situations where we cannot support voluntary use without also lending a hand to involuntary use.
Angelina i see it differently, it can be decided by a court. the children and the parents make an application and a judge approves or denies it.
It is easy to say "courts can decide" if you completely ignore the "how". Judges do not magically know the truth, they are just trained to consider and weigh evidence. Court proceedings are expensive. Getting evidence that points in favor or against consent is also expensive, especially if the victim does not cooperate with the prosecution (e.g. your own case). And even with all that, judges still make mistakes.
