Angelina I am not sure if this will help, unless Christine is thinking about returning to her ex-husband, everything else is probably not helping at the moment. (just my opinion)
I wasn't really thinking of Christine but everyone there are many divorced women in Chastity but I don't think any of it is meant maliciously
Do you know anything about Marriage contracts? I didn't remember mine but I know the prenup is a little generous in my favor more of a settlement.
Laura We honestly don’t know HOW many people are in reluctant chastity, since it’s often so secret. But the same people as your parents, who believe in enforcing chastity on unmarried women, would probably take a dim view of divorced women and prefer that they remain locked until they can be married off again. And you yourself well know how far they’ll go to keep women who are well into adulthood belted if that’s what it takes to retain virtue.
I don't know of any cases, but you're probably right.
If the woman lives in the same city as her parents, it would be very positive.
Unfortunately, modern life does not always mesh well with good habits.
Saintprudence We honestly don’t know HOW many people are in reluctant chastity, since it’s often so secret
@Megan might know more
Saintprudence would probably take a dim view of divorced women and prefer that they remain locked until they can be married off again
But the situation is different, because she was not longer tied to her parents
Laura true, but it can always be encouraged by family!
Renita it would change divorce a lot if it was commonly understood divorcees would be expected to return to belted status! However, without reliable family to cover it, this would be hard to enforce. Probably prone to abuse, too, but it’s amusing to consider!
Rafael as always, reliable and responsible key-holding is one of the big bottlenecks for effective chastity!
Laura because she was not longer tied to her parents
Neither to her ex-husband.
Saintprudence However, without reliable family to cover it, this would be hard to enforce.
It should be her choice, while the family can strongly recommend it, especially if she worn one before.
Angelina if you think she has a fetish, you should talk to her openly about it, it is not good if she forces you to wear a belt because she claims to want to protect you, but is actually following her own fantasies.
Many people here support her decision regardless what causes it. Form another hand fetish means toy, but I wear a real chastity belt.
Megan What if the fault of the divorce is on the man?
Ofc it was his fault.
Angelina unless @Christine is thinking about returning to her ex-husband
No way !
Megan Do you know anything about Marriage contracts?
People us i to maintain marital status.
Christine Ofc it was his fault.
Was this ever taken into account when you were belted? Did you accept it somewhat willing at first?
Megan Do you know anything about Marriage contracts?
yes, i know that and even though i can understand it, i don't think it's good. a wedding always means taking on responsibility, for that i need the marriage vows, but not a separate contract.
Saintprudence But the same people as your parents, who believe in enforcing chastity on unmarried women, would probably take a dim view of divorced women and prefer that they remain locked until they can be married off again.
i would disagree on one point. they would not do it if the main reason is virginity, because a divorced woman is definitely not a virgin anymore
Christine regardless what causes it.
i would never do that. i think the reason she wants you in her belt is the "key" to everything (little pun). because if she doesn't want to protect you, or even control you, but just wants to live out her own sexual fantasies, that's definitely wrong.
Christine Ofc it was his fault.
does your mother think so too?
Angelina would disagree on one point. they would not do it if the main reason is virginity, because a divorced woman is definitely not a virgin anymore
That’s true, but anyone who believes in banning masturbation could easily follow the logic that post-divorce masturbation is out of bounds. If you are preventing masturbation for moral reasons, a divorcee is as good a candidate for belting as an unwed woman. (Maybe moreso, for the extremely conservative types who believe in marriage as a tool to control women.) How many people on this forum are still virgins to sex but have been belted after being caught or confessing to self-touch?
Yes, I never said that there were no good reasons, but I just wanted to make it clear that at least this goal (and in my opinion there are quite a few who want exactly that) can no longer be achieved
Angelina I have to admit that I’m in a more authoritarian mood than usual, to the point that today I feel like it should be the default that all people, but especially single women, be kept under lock and key unless there is a good reason not to! I’d wear my belt myself today if I hadn’t promised Goody I wouldn’t wear it for a year. Maybe being unbelted makes me crueller!
Angelina because a divorced woman is definitely not a virgin anymore
Do you think that nobody cares about sexual activity of a single non-virgin girl?
Saintprudence but anyone who believes in banning masturbation could easily follow the logic that post-divorce masturbation is out of bounds
No masturbation, but sex only. Of course, you don't agree with me.
Renita No masturbation, but sex only. Of course, you don't agree with me.
No, nor does your keyholder, whose opinion seems to hold sway here. She wants to prevent slutty behavior and defines masturbation as part of that, so she takes responsibility to prevent it. It is true that the shield serves other safety purposes, but those can be fulfilled without locking it. The shield lock keeps you away from where you shouldn’t be touching, though!
