And any man who unilaterally imposes such rules is an abuser. As part of a consensual D/s relationship, sure, but we are definitely talking enthusiastic consent here. Anything else is not discipline, it is domestic violence, and it reeks of "putting the broad in her place".
And with a daughter involved, the dependency relationship pretty much rules out any way of determining if consent is truly enthusiastic and given freely. So no... maintenance discipline on a daughter is just a big no-no.
And while I would equally vehemently disagree with forced (i.e. non-consensual, not merely enforced) chastity or corporal punishment in all but the most extreme circumstances, I can at least sort of see how those could be justified under a somewhat different value system as averting a greater evil. On the other hand, any value system where there are evils greater than such forms of discipline that this discipline defends from is so alien to me that I do not dare entertain the thought of such a thing being in any way acceptable.