Foreskin and chastity
If I were younger, I would have the foreskin removed to improve cleanliness while locked in chastity. Depending on the device, I have to be released every 3 to 5 days to clean nder the foreskin. A real nusinance, especially for the keyholder. It also makes it too easy to masturbate, which I want to avoid,
As a side note, if I were younger, I would get a Prince Albert piercing to allow me to wear a chastity device that is secured by the piercing such as "Lorie's Tubes". Very comfortable, easy to keep clean, and very secure.
Just encouraging young men to do the things I wish I would have done.
- Edited
Angelina Same. It was also growing inside the urethra.
After having removed it, the only disadvantage I have today is that I can't really feel the senitives touchness the way others do abd that it hurts and the scars become sore after habing masturbated - no matter what kind of lube I use or how soft I do it.
Therefore I have an easy time being locked in cages and belts in that point, as being caged while having a foreskin is pretty difficult and can cause some issues.
Maybe it's the way I'm told that I belong in a belt.
Again, I don't want to scare anyone, it's just the way I experienced it and this is a special case.
Edit: From what I've heard the soreness after
masturbation is nut unusual, but also not very common. It might also depend on how tight you have been circumised, as I've heard. But what is normal and always the case is the loss of sensitivity
Edit2: Explanation why foreskin and cages can cause some issues: The foreskin can be pulöed backwards and foreward over the rose end. Sometimes, when moving around it can slide over the rose part and find its way through the urination gap of the cage. Becoming erected now makes the penis press the foresik against the edge of the cage. Having a tightly fitted cage maked it difficulr to pull back the foreskin.
With a belt that shouldn't be a case as I imagine, because there's not an urination gap needed as you can fit a small uriation tube / hole there.
- Edited
bdsamm Just encouraging young men to do the things I wish I would have done.
This question always bugs me. If I could go back in time and lay down the law, then yeah, I'd fit a belt onto my 20s self. And getting my PA was a good choice too. But would I get a circumcision? I dunno. Maybe I needed the experience of years to come to make such a radical choice?
Max9 I dunno about the PA. Yeah, I've heard many good things about it from many guys, but it neither looks comfortable nor healthy at all.
The PA is relatively painless and quick to heal as the skin pierced is actually very thin. Up to a certain size ring the piercing is mostly reversible, but beyond that you're stuck with it. A PA does tend to interfere with urination making the stream direction kinda random and chaotic. The ring does add a degree of new sensation. And finally, the PA does give a huge increase in security of a chastity device effectively preventing pull-out.
Anyway, I hope folk can agree that circumcision of the entire foreskin is a much more radical modification than a 3mm piecing and that anyone considering either should really think about the consequences and be absolutely sure.
Here in the US circumcision is fairly common. However, with my 2 sons (both now in their 20s) when they were born, we said no. You would be shocked how much pressure the doctor and hospital put on us to have circumcision. Everything from "they are going to look different from other boys in the locker room of school" to "you know you are going to have to teach them hygiene, right?". We stood our ground and said no to circumcision. We both felt it is their body and their choice to make. An infant cannot make such a decision.
Kai "Have to teach him hygiene". The horror!
Also, I am pretty sure that any boy in a school locker room who notices something about another boy's penis will be pretending he did not see anything because he would have to admit where he was looking.