Actually, we all need it, at least the women who believe in the values of chastity.
Along with the most obvious consequence of avoid sexual activity of women while carrying it, the belt also has other implications for our lives.
On the one hand, it makes us have to endure, at times, our needs, and to have to focus on other tasks, despite the imperative appetite of our body to surrender to pleasure.
And secondly, the combination of belt and beloved man, makes me a much more loving wife, and (Ines do not read this), I think my husband will have few complaints in more than 23 years of marriage.
When I was in college, one of my roommates was a very religious girl, her parents were very closely linked to Opus Dei, but the poor, especially in exam times, could not help but succumb to pleasure.
Many nights I could hear her crying in her room, and the traces of the sackiness in the morning were terrifying. I was so overwhelmed with the situation, I was in that house for just over 6 months. All that suffering would have been avoided with a belt.
For women who value the value of chastity, we do not include in it only virginity, but our renunciation of control of our pleasure aand this is only possible by using a secondary shield, better if you can add bands to the set.
Without a belt, of course, you would all arrive with your virginity intact to your Prince Charming, but how many would we not have succumbed to having given us pleasure at some point?
That's why, from my perspective, the use of chastity belts should only be worn by those girls who are concerned about what I have written. If chastity, mettle, or surrender are not values of the girl (who will have equally respectable ones), wearing a belt can only be a source of anger and grudge.