Laura don't you think girls who wants only rich man are kind of gold diggers, don't get me wrong and im not saying anyone here is a gold digger but the entire concept of feminism is independence and equality. The idea of that thread is kind of old fashioned and maybe it could hold its relevance before women were allowed to work. I think times have changed and most women I know want to be even richer than the man they marry
ok, as the posts have been separated into a new topic i would like to add something
i think the ideal age for a wedding is 25 to 30 years, which is much later than i will get married and you should also be financially independent ( unlike me )
Angelina Is there an ideal age? My dad became father when he was 50. Now I'll be 20 soon and he'll be 70 soon. Others who are only a few yeaes older then me also already get married and have children. I mean - there is no perfect time. After all the perfect time is when you truely believe to have found the one partner you want to share your entire life with, regardless of what's coming in the future.
Angelina sorry, but that is very naive and old-fashioned
Talking about it is old-fashioned, because you are supposed to strive for a career. But the reality is different if you look deeper.
it's not about what's possible. my father get me when he was 35 years old, he was only married for a short time and has been divorced shortly after my birth.
of course there are other solutions, i will probably marry at 20 and my girlfriend will be 18, but i am talking about what i think is ideal, that is just my opinion
the reality is that there are not enough rich men for all women and therefore women also can have careers 
Angelina this is unfortunately true, fortunately it is not yet existing (except as a fetish toy)
Happily,yes!
Angelina i think the ideal age for a wedding is 25 to 30 years, which is much later than i will get married and you should also be financially independent ( unlike me )
I agree,25 to 30 can be good,generally you've finished your studies and maybe have a job.Being financially independent is important too,yes.
I would add that the two partners should be in love(of course),and the relationship should have lasted long enough(at least 2 to 3 years without breaking up during it,even temporarily).Better if living together too,it is a very important step for a couple.
Renita It depends on how you define rich,
Enough to support her.
Renita It depends on how you define rich, every girl does it her own way.
he would at least have to earn more money than I could, which in my case would exclude 90% of all men (and in my case also women)
Laura And looking for a younger
this is unfortunately often true 
Vanessa I would add that the two partners should be in love(of course),and the relationship should have lasted long enough(at least 2 to 3 years without breaking up during it,even temporarily).Better if living together too,it is a very important step for a couple.
i agree these points are also very important, that's why i don't believe in marriages that are concluded after less than a year
Laura There's apoint in it, sone do. Just like some women. There are unloyal people in each gender - just that I feel women care generally more about what job you have whereas men also marry women who are poor / have a lower social status... like for example a ceo who is married with a nurse or something like that. That's pretty common. But you barely hear from female ceos who marry an unemployed man for example. Exept for some rich grannies who are with their toyboy
Max9 Which is known as hypergamy.
