Vanessa Depends how often she did it.
It was often. Is there a limit we should adhere to? At the time a chastity belt would have been very, very damaging to me, both physically and psychologically. That's why I am strongly against belting teenagers against their will... stopping them from taking care of themselves and labelling girls as "sluts" for doing what is natural / necessary is incredibly damaging.
You can play excessively but it doesn't mean you're addicted. It's not as simple as that. There are other reasons why it has to be done... self care, tension relief etc etc.
Hitting the reset button is important for a lot of people.
Kaja OMG! Why?
My mom thinks so.
Vanessa Even if I think than more than 1 or twice a day,for a woman,would tend to be too much.
well, if i am still successful in life in all other things, it should not matter 
Sin But locking things up isn't always the answer.
it is not the best answer, but it is an answer
what would be your alternative ?
shinydiamond77 Simply not being directly harmful does not mean it's fine or even necessary to allow. Unlike boys, girls almost never have a valid reason to touch there, especially when a bidet is available. In almost every situation, when a girl touches there, it would be better if she didn't or couldn't. That's why a girl doing anything involving her private area should require permission first.
I suppose I missed this comment earlier 
.
The first sentence of the above quote doesn't even make sense to me. In this context what is meant by "fine"? As @Sin points out later on; not only is masturbation not directly harmful, it is actually not harmful at all. Surely this means it is "fine". At least on a physical level. And who are you referring to when you say "necessary to allow"? Who is to do the allowing? Are you deliberately restricting the subject from touching her own body against her will? What gives this person the right to disallow?
It may be your opinion that:
"Unlike boys, girls almost never have a valid reason to touch there, especially when a bidet is available. In almost every situation, when a girl touches there, it would be better if she didn't or couldn't. That's why a girl doing anything involving her private area should require permission first."
It certainly isn't my opinion. Nor is it indeed the opinion of the majority of the Western world (including scientists and the medical profession) excluding certain religious beliefs. And I fear that those from whom the girl should require permission first, are acting on their own interests and beliefs, not hers. I believe frequently her interests are excluded completely. It may be that a man prizes the fact that he marries a virgin. It may enhance his status in his community and strengthen his ego. I doubt it does so much for his wife, never mind that she has been denied the pleasures of her body just for him.
This is not to cast aspersion on women who wish to remain virginal for their partner. I think it is laudable and shows their love for the man they have selected. But it should be their choice surely? Anything else, particularly where "force" is neither laudable for the man and means nothing to the woman other than her suffering.
In just three sentences your paragraph summarizes everything I find distasteful about the sort of chastity so frequently described on this forum and has nothing at all to do with the commitment to a loving partner, the reason I too wear a chastity belt.
