Sorry to be so curious, but you have or somehow secure / check CB or lock against cheating?

    C-B Whom are you asking?

    • C-B replied to this.

      C-B I dont have cb (Fortunately? unfortunately ๐Ÿ˜€?)

        Kaja unfortunately ๐Ÿ˜€?)

        I believe that you will not get along your belt! I think you are so much liberal for it.
        Please do not take offense.

        • Kaja replied to this.

          Ines I really want one to my (our) pleasure ๐Ÿ˜‰

          • Jen replied to this.
          • Ines likes this.

            C-B Sorry to be so curious, but you have or somehow secure / check CB or lock against cheating?

            well, that's why the belt has a padlock. so to put it naively ๐Ÿ˜‚

            Kaja I really want one to my (our) pleasure

            They do mess with your head - like I'm sure you've thought about it yeah it's a rush. But I call that a toy belt ๐Ÿคฃ. chastity belt is different - it control's you or like you let it control you.

              C-B but you have or somehow secure / check CB or lock against cheating?

              Make sure it's locked completely, especially the secondary shield.

              • C-B replied to this.

                Jen But I call that a toy belt ๐Ÿคฃ. chastity belt is different - it control's you or like you let it control you.

                i agree, maybe we should finally clearly define what is serious use and what is play

                  Angelina i agree, maybe we should finally clearly define what is serious use and what is play

                  I'll take a stab at that. If the belt is intended to prevent sexual pleasure it's serious use, if it's intended to enhance sexual pleasure it's a toy.

                    Avery I'll take a stab at that. If the belt is intended to prevent sexual pleasure it's serious use, if it's intended to enhance sexual pleasure it's a toy.

                    My belt - well it's to enhance sexual pleasure by delaying it until I'm married๐Ÿคฃ

                    Lol sorry actually I like your definition

                      Jen That is the thing. When you have an unrestricted quantity of sexual pleasure, the quality suffers as a result, so preventing and enhancing pleasure are not mutually exclusive.

                        youdontknowme preventing and enhancing pleasure are not mutually exclusive

                        Right. But in @Jen 's case she has a serious purpose. The definition, methinks, must go to the user's purpose, not what kind of belt one has.

                        Avery I'll take a stab at that. If the belt is intended to prevent sexual pleasure it's serious use, if it's intended to enhance sexual pleasure it's a toy.

                        that sounds good, i think i would be very happy with the definition ๐Ÿ™‚

                        youdontknowme

                        this can happen automatically, of course, but i think the important thing for the classification is the purpose with which the wearer wants to wear the belt.

                        a month later

                        Avery I'll take a stab at that. If the belt is intended to prevent sexual pleasure it's serious use, if it's intended to enhance sexual pleasure it's a toy.

                        Something I'd like to add. My first belt was one I borrowed from my mother, who used it as a toy while fooling around with my Dad. I then used it as a serious device to protect me after I was assaulted. So the same belt served two purposes, one recreational and one serious.

                          Avery urgh that creeps me. Like I could handle a second hand belt if it fit right.... but my mum's sex toy๐Ÿคฎ