- Edited
Taz Locks might need a bit more thinking about, I was never happy with the side chains connecting to the waistband with padlocks that always seemed like an efficient but ugly way to do it.
Instead of a lock, you could also do the following. If you put the connection from the CB to the thigh bands through each and secure it from the body side, you wouldn't need a lock. When the CB and the belt are locked, they cannot be loosened. To secure it you could screw a plate above, or the end has a T-shape. You put is through and turn it around 90°. There is a recess in the band into which the T-piece fits. If the bands have no slack you could not get it off.
I expect at the waist it would work but I am not so sure a the thighs. From what I read here the thigh band should fit well but not as tight as at the waist.
Taz 3D printed thighbands are a good idea but I am not at all sure how you would measure that to get the right shape,
Use a 3D scanner and you get the shape. I think it will need some iteration to get the right tightness done but it should improve how they fit.
Taz Seems to me all thighbands tend to hang at an angle
Why not adopt the concept of a stocking holder. A secure connection is needed the other bands would have the task of holding it in the correct position. They can be placed in the front and in the back. For example, made of elastic material to adapt to movement.