Chastity belt law

Angelina interesting, if it were introduced like this, suddenly all the contracts i made with my father about it would be legally enforceable. kind of a scary idea because it's always been a private thing

That’s one of the reasons it makes me nervous, too. Still, we would never see chastity devices go mainstream until culture is ready for mature discussions about sex. There are only two reasons to be locked into a belt: to prevent masturbation and to prevent sex. People just aren’t ready for that conversation. I would love it if my belt were as commonly accepted as, say, the bulky braces I wore after my car crash years ago. But the difference is, nobody gets nervous and red-faced when talking about rehab equipment from a car crash. They get VERY weird about talking about masturbating-prevention equipment, though.

Saintprudence a binding contract between parents and adult children - omg yikes

Rafael it's okay for married women to wear it because that way, if they want to put their husband's bags at the door,

Yes there have to be options because I've been very fortunate in love but not to long ago I was depressed realizing not everyone has as sweet a romance as I do.

Angelina have another question for everyone
what is your opinion on replacing prison sentences with chastity sentences? So someone who gets 5 years in prison would get 5 years in a chastity belt instead. The question arises above all in relation to pure sexual offences

NO! That would not work out. Maybe it could be part of therapy for people who aren't restrained.
It could definitely help a few women to slow things down and think twice and decide not to get pregnant with a drug addict. Those have been problems with people in places with Meth and Opiod.
Just redoing the hallways and doors would probably prevent half of the times men rape each other.

bdsamm It would just be wonderful if the government would make belts available for any "adult" woman that wants one.

You don't need the government involved, but bigger market.

Saintprudence Lord knows there are enough religious fanatics who would genuinely lock up women en masse. But I don’t see it happening any time soon.

Even in Saudi Arabia / Iran / Afghanistan their leaders don't (Even Talibans!) lock up women en masse...

I think there is hypocrisy. In the end I think that neither parents nor boyfriends nor husbands like their girls to do things.
With a law that allows them to put a lock on us, that's it, the government would not have to do more.

Yolanda is your belief then that the law should permit locking up but then stay out of it afterward?

Saintprudence

If I'm honest, yes. I'm not saying it was good, or not totally, but if it were legal I think that in general parents and husbands would already take care that their girls don't do things that we shouldn't do.

Rina Even in Saudi Arabia / Iran / Afghanistan their leaders don't (Even Talibans!) lock up women en masse...

ITS WORSE!!! They have that FGM!

Saintprudence People just aren’t ready for that conversation.

right, and that goes both ways, as far as having sex and preventing sex are concerned. which is also a pity, i think we have become an open society, so that shouldn't be a problem any more.

Megan NO! That would not work out.

probably not and it would put all volunteers on the same level as offenders, but i find the idea interesting

Yolanda With a law that allows them to put a lock on us, that's it, the government would not have to do more.

But that would not be enough, the government would have to set the exact conditions so that no abuse happens

Angelina

Angelina But that would not be enough, the government would have to set the exact conditions so that no abuse happens

I don't think it was necessary...
Are you single and have one, two, three, four or five locks (like me)?
There is no problem, your parents or your husband are taking good care of you.
What else happens? There are already laws to fall back on... we're talking about a law of chastity belts not that we become slaves.

I think more or less the same. I think that if it were legal, initially a majority percentage of society would wear a chastity belt for their girls.
Of the percentage of girls in families who didn't think it was necessary, many, in the end, would end up using it because of peer pressure, not wanting to be the class bitch, or the office bitch, and the like.
In the end the law has to say that it is legal to keep single girls with a chastity belt and who should be the keyholder who can do it.
Are you single, you don't want to wear a belt but your, for example, father makes you have one? All legal.
Do you wear a belt, your keyholder, for example, never opens it and Your have to suffer from chafing or lack of hygiene? There are already laws that allow reporting abuse regardless of whether chastity belts are used or not.

If the law not only allows, but requires, it is different.
Probably most of the population complied with the law, the majority for agreeing, and the rest, in the end because it does not force anything bad either.
Of the percentage that was radically against, if the control would be more complicated. I am not a specialist, but here identity cards have a chip. I suppose that if we girls are assigned a second chip to wear on our belt, it would be possible to check on devices on public roads if we carry both chips with us or not.
In the houses, control would already be very, very complicated.

Angelina I have another question for everyone
what is your opinion on replacing prison sentences with chastity sentences? So someone who gets 5 years in prison would get 5 years in a chastity belt instead. The question arises above all in relation to pure sexual offences

No.
But I think that the chastity belt should be mandatory in prisons.
I do not conceive that a woman who has suffocated her baby has the right to that pleasure in prison.
The discipline and good behavior that he did not learn in freedom would be taught by the penitentiary institution.

Ines The problem with such a law is that it hands control of adults over to other adults, and I’m not sure that’s something we really want happening. It formalizes a group of second-class citizens who are dependent on their keyholders. What about women who would want to opt out of the system, but their legal keyholders want them to stay in the belt? What would the the priority order of keyholders if they had no living parents? Would women be permitted to keyhold or would it be strictly about men controlling women? And would single men be subject to being locked up?

Saintprudence
Totally agree.
Without a doubt, it is something that I personally do not think is good, or not exactly so.
About those girls who do not want to, but their keyholders do, it is clear that they would have the law against them.
Although I think that, at least in a very substantial part, it could be successful because I think that many fathers and husbands would take advantage of that.
Currently, chastity only works because it is voluntary, I don't believe the horror stories, but in that scenario, without consequences, I would probably have to start believing many scary stories. If we girls lose the protection of willpower, we are lost.
The list of possible keyholders, who are the ones who can ultimately force the girl, would appear hierarchically in the law.
I would probably put: husband, father, mother and brother.
I do not understand or share the concept of male chastity, so they would only serve as a keyholder.
Don't get me wrong, I think this would all be a setback, but I also think that if it were raised, we would be in for a nasty surprise seeing the number of supporters.

Ines Don't get me wrong, I think this would all be a setback, but I also think that if it were raised, we would be in for a nasty surprise seeing the number of supporters.

I do agree with you there. America’s conservative side, which numbers over a hundred million people, is obsessed with controlling women, preventing masturbation, and enforcing virginity. I suspect that the main reason we don’t see widespread interest in chastity on that side of things is that they thinks belts are either a myth or big unwieldy medieval chunks of metal.

I will confess it’s an interesting social simulation experiment for the reasons you mention. How many would do it out of social pressure? Probably a lot. How many adult women would barely be on speaking terms with their families over belting? Also a lot. But then, how many women would have to stay in contact with family members they hated because they hold the keys? I have met a lot of older, very traditional parents who would be thrilled to maintain that level of control over their adult single or divorced daughters, and would be very pleased to know that their husbands had chastity rights.

Saintprudence

It is exact.
You have understood exactly what I wanted to express.