curious Nobody on this forum is actually a completely Involuntary wearer by that definition.
All have some Form of motivation to continue in the belt, be it financial or emotional motivations.
But nobody here (as far as I have read) has been physically forced to wear the belt. So we can stop complaining about abuse and Involuntary belting even in the more extreme cases, right?
Emotional and financial issues can create real compulsion and, depending on the situation, may be enough to speak of involuntary wearing of a chastity belt. What I meant, however, was situations related to contracts (which you have repeatedly referred to), which do not have to have any serious element of coercion.
curious she did not have the necessary sophistication and education how to behave herself appropriately
Not everyone has the opportunity to receive such an education. Undoubtedly, she should work on her discussion and argumentation skills.
curious But then, maybe the whole dispute how a chastity belt is approached is actually an issue that is connected to social classes? Higher classes tend to be more conservative, value certain behaviour much higher than lower classes and part of that conservative value system is stricter focus on serious chastity, which of course people from lower classes see as bad and want to fight, because it against their egalitarian views?
Interesting consideration, but it seems to me that chastity belts are such a niche issue that it is difficult to formulate more general conclusions from the sociological point of view. I also have doubts about the generalization that the upper classes are more conservative than the lower ones. Looking at the situation in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe, I would say that it is exactly the opposite.
