Jenna We do talk about this. regularly.

Yes. And if you had copied in what I said people could see I said I was certain @susan would talk to you before proceeding.

Jenna Yes it is my preference that they avoid sex, but belt wearing is only successful of both parties agree.

Our only disagreement is that you prefer belt-wearing to moral education and emotional support.

    May I kindly ask to stay in topic?
    Thank you

    Avery This endangers the girl's relationship with her guardian. The guardian who said in her second post she has considerable financial control over the girls.

    Avery I'm certain Jenna would not cast her out if she went ahead with this. But some parents might.

    It feelslike you are implyimg a certain degree of lip service there.

      Avery Cast out? It will not be parents and familly but dangerous psychopats

      Kaja You are wrong at this toppic.

      Not sure what you mean. If you think my views are wrong I have no comment. If you think we are off topic we are discussing the situation of a belted girl dating and what to do about sex. That's the topic.

      Milord I would like to know the unbelted point of view, not about dating in general

      Then you should be specific boy or girl.

        Avery I have moved our conversation over to "Belting for Nieces" so as not to incur anyone's wrath.

        Susan You are 100% right. She thinks it is best to wait...

        For you and Jenna I'll explain my post again because otherwise I'm afraid it could be misunderstood. Your boyfriend accepts a long-distance relationship and the chastity belt, that's great, he really seems to love you and if he can continue to accept it well, the relationship will work well in the long term, because then you already know how to deal with difficult situations. @Jenna once wrote that a condition for removing the belt would be that you have a long-term relationship and I think the chances are really good if the relationship continues like this that he will do everything to make it "worth it" (and yes Anyone can criticize my choice of words) to have sex with you (from your aunt's perspective and not right now, but in the not too distant future).

        I'm sorry if my post was unclear

          Avery Angelina spent four years dating the same person before they (after marrying) had the opportunity for a completely unbelted night in bed together. "Not too distant" could easily be over a year in that context.

          Milord why? They are both welcome for me

          An unbelted girl dating a belted boy is not the same as an unbelted boy dating a belted girl.

            Renita
            In a modern world where gender based roles are becoming more and more obsolete, there is not much difference.
            Only if your world is viewed through an old fashioned lens of different rules for men vs women, the question who of the two is belted makes a difference.

              Renita I think it may depend to some extent on the type and design of the belts but I think the cases are more alike than they are different. I think you have good ideas and good posts so I am interested to hear why you think they are not the same.

                Tjc still I want to hear from everyone, and I don’t want to create several threads for all the scenarios. I think they all fit in the same thread. To answer to @Renita too

                i think in many ways our early sexual activity will help define our overall sexual life. If a woman is not submissive, how will pleasuring a man with no pleasure for herself, effect her later sex life? Will she become independent and control her sex life or will she always give into the demands of the man and in essence just become a life long play thing?