VivianChaste i have yet to see where to find one, but i do want a bra

You could start with a cheap Chinese bra to find out how it is wearing one. If you like it you can always look for a made to measure one from My-Steel for example. To make it even more secure you could have chains connecting the bra to the belt also. Then you will be quite sure it stays where it should be.

So it will be wise to have D-rings at the side of the belt and an extra D-ring in the crotch area for the thighbands. Then you can have a chain pulling your legs together when you will be sitting. Very lady like.

Rina Solo keyholding is kind of hard without using a timed lockbox, I'd recommend having a keyholder you can 100% trust, if possible.

A timed lockbox is better than nothing. But a real KH is much better. Remote KH is possible if you find someone you can trust. Trust is very important of course. You can also think of a combination of a timed lockbox and a KH in order to get to know each other and build trust. You can set a long time for the lockbox for example. And if you need to be unlocked before the box opens the KH can unlock. You can set a guaranteed maximum time then. If the trust builds you can increase the time for the lockbox.
There may be other options as well. Give up control and being completely at the mercy of your KH may be a next (big) step. If your KH says no it really is NO then. Then the experience will be very real.

    Padre There may be other options as well. Give up control and being completely at the mercy of your KH may be a next (big) step. If your KH says no it really is NO then. Then the experience will be very real.

    But ALWAYS with emergency key at home

      Not necessarily, standard emergency key in a tamper-evident container. It's there in case you need it, but you can still be held accountable for how you use it. If you don't live with your keyholder, it's the only way I can think of to set up a keyholding relationship safely.

      Of course, It somewhat depends on what the point is in the first place, but I think for @VivianChaste's goals it would work fine.

      • Rina replied to this.

        pestulens

        No, in case of emergency key is the simplest way to get out. As you know my wife had a very bad accident she is still recovering. Luckily she was unbelted but, even with key, if belted it would have been impossible to remove even with key

        In emergency you have to use the fasted way to do things, and for getting out of the belt the fastest way is the key. That's all.

        • Tjc replied to this.
        • Joh likes this.

          pestulens standard emergency key in a tamper-evident container

          In my opinion, it sounds the best way. If keyholder does regular check-ins of that container, since it's tamper evident, chastity belt rules both wearer and keyholder agreed upon would be able to be enforced. (So if such container is tampered, wearer will have to explain why emergency key was used.)

          VivianChaste I say focus on the belt first. What's your budget? How much can you spend? If you can't buy the branded ones, go for a Chinese belt first. As other say fit is the first nain issue. Hygiene is what you plan. 24/7? Try a few hours first then see how long you like it on. Pee many times to find the sitting position as with no 2.

          Clothes arent really the issue unless you wear super skin tight. Hip style is good for jeans - most or waist style for dresses.

          Check https://www.brassiered.com/enchaste/contents.html

          Milord In emergency you have to use the fasted way to do things, and for getting out of the belt the fastest way is the key. That's all.

          The fastest way to remove a belt is with tools used by emergency medical services. This damages or destroys the belt but that is minor compared to the need to remove a belt in an emergency. Keeping this in mind means not having to rely on an emergency key. In am emergency, it may not be possible for the wearer to access the emergency key or tell others how to find it or use it. Removal with emergency tools is fast and easy for responders. This is, of course, only our opinion based on my experience as a long time wearer, without an emergency key.

            Tjc

            Let's say you have an immense pain coming from the part closed in your belt. While you are suffering unbearable pain you will:
            1) call your keyholder to urgently get there and open you
            2) call emergency medical services and wait for them to open you
            3) use hacksaw or other tools
            4) use emergency key

            Which one is fastest? Which one is the most logical one?

            • Tjc replied to this.

              Laura

              No comment Laura. It's your life. But everyone else, don't do as Laura and get an emergency key.

                Tjc This is, of course, only our opinion based on my experience as a long time wearer, without an emergency key.

                This is like saying "This is, of course, only our opinion based on my experience as a long time driver, without safety belt."

                I hope you never need it.

                Laura What do you see as the "cons" for an emergency key, safely protected by some sort of tamper evident storage?

                  Laura

                  Safety should be a primary concern of everyone, ESPECIALLY of parents. I honestly can't understand this but I understand almost nothing of your life, so basically I'm trying to abstain from even comment it.

                  But may I gently ask you and @Tjc to avoid endorsing an unsafe behavior?

                  Not having an emergency key is a very dangerous thing. If I need to explain it I will, but I hope that is pretty obvious.

                    Milord I mean, everything we do in life is a tradeoff of risks and benefits, and we constantly set acceptable risk levels. If we always played everything safe, we would get nothing done.

                    That said, not having an emergency key is a lot of risk for very little reward. Sure, the belt will feel mildly more secure and there is mildly less strain on your willpower compared to a sealed emergency key, but belts are not indestructible nor inescapable (lockpicking is a thing, and neither small padlocks nor most tubular locks are particularly resistant against it), so there is already some level of trust that the locked person will not act out of line involved in belting.

                    And yes, in everyone's favorite horror scenario of several broken bones and whiplash after a traffic accident, the key is probably not going to make much of a difference. But there are plenty of other emergencies that might require immediate release without rendering the wearer unconscious or otherwise unresponsive. Inflammations would be the first thing coming to my mind.

                    If you have carefully assessed the safety implications of not having an emergency key, I could somewhat accept (but not condone) the decision you made. You are your own person and you have the right to make reckless decisions. But when it comes to a keyholder forcing such a decision on a wearer, this sort of distrust is a massive red flag. When it comes to recommending unsafe actions to beginners, you are putting people who are not equipped to make that assessment themselves in harm's way. No. Just no.

                      youdontknowme That said, not having an emergency key is a lot of risk for very little reward.

                      I still have to understand where the reward lies. Now, as much as a lot of people want to (self?) convince that belt is inescapable, it's not. Getting out is staggering easy. The difference is that without key destruction is more probable, but lets make it clear. Anyone that really wants to get out will get out.

                      Let me also add that suggesting to someone with a remote keyholder not to have an emergency key is really mad.

                        Milord Marginally reduced reliance on willpower as breaking a seal requires less effort than picking or lock or damaging a belt, and causes less cost to resume chastity device use than the latter, I reckon. Not a good trade in my eyes.