Saintprudence

Yes,but I respect her choice.

Angelina

Sure.

Angelina a little trust must be given in an anonymous forum πŸ™‚

I agree.

Saintprudence I think her perspective would be pretty interesting to add

I agree,especially as your case if pretty different.

Daniel thinks that he wouldn't be very welcome here and he doesn't want to fight because of the kind of our relationship.

    Sara2001 Daniel thinks that he wouldn't be very welcome here

    well you explained your relationship pretty well, so he would be very welcome from my side. i would like to know some background information. by that i mean that i am a small hobby psychologist and would like to know why he thinks the way he does πŸ™‚

      Sara2001 I would welcome his presence, but admittedly, I probably have the closest kind of relationship to a spouse to what you and he have anyway.

      Angelina well you explained your relationship pretty well, so he would be very welcome from my side. i would like to know some background information. by that i mean that i am a small hobby psychologist and would like to know why he thinks the way he does

      You can ask me πŸ™‚ I know all the ideas behind it very well. Otherwise I wouldn't accept the rules so happily πŸ™‚

      Saintprudence Maybe we could convince our significant others to answer questions from the group πŸ™‚.

      I will give questions to him and will post his answers if you want.

      Laura Tell him that only trolls are not welcome

      I can ask him again.

        Laura Tell him that only trolls are not welcome

        🀣

        Sara2001 You can ask me πŸ™‚ I know all the ideas behind it very well. Otherwise I wouldn't accept the rules so happily πŸ™‚

        yes but you both have very different roles in your relationship and so i think i could learn more about how he sees himself in his role πŸ™‚

          Angelina yes but you both have very different roles in your relationship and so i think i could learn more about how he sees himself in his role

          I will give a possible question to him and post his answers here, so you can get his point of view this way.

            Sara2001

            a very complicated way, but i might come back to it. the problem is that when you answer you have to make sure that we understand whether the answer comes from you or from Daniel

            Sara2001

            Even if we disagree with some of his opinion,we can discuss with him politely.

            Laura

            Right.

            Sara2001

            Not the easiest way to discuss,but why not.

              Sara2001

              i am sorry, but i still find it too complicated to communicate through a third person πŸ˜‚ thank you for the offer, but therefore I decline πŸ™‚

                Angelina i am sorry, but i still find it too complicated to communicate through a third person πŸ˜‚ thank you for the offer, but therefore I decline

                Okay. He still doesn't like the idea to write here. He reads here from time to time, but he don't want to interfere this.

                  No. I don't think he is registered here and he would most probably use another Nick.

                  Sara2001 He reads here from time to time, but he don't want to interfere this.

                  just like camryn πŸ™‚ no problem

                  Laura I have seen someone with nick @Danielle yesterday. It was he?

                  by the spelling of the name, i would rather say that it is a woman 🀣

                    Angelina i would rather say that it is a woman

                    Me too, but I thought it's different in German

                      Sara2001 I have two queries for Daniel:

                      Knowing that your fiancΓ©e has endured chastity for so long, why continue to subject her to it?

                      And even if you think chastity in itself is a wise idea, why add the thigh bands and bra, which feel more like instruments of punishment than barriers of morality?