Users, are you married or not, while in/out of chastity?
Joh It is pretty much the difference between "chastity" and "enforced chastity". You are chaste whenever you do not engage in unapproved sexual activity, which in most cultures means you only have sex within a marriage or similarly committed relationship. You are celibate when you do not take steps to enter such a relationship, so only being chaste and celibate requires complete and utter sexual abstinence.
youdontknowme
I agree.
When we break it down the whole chastity we find that in a good working relationship it is happen.
Than I ask myself why is a CB than necessary? Because of the key holder has a trust problem!
If no trust is in a relation how much is the relation worth?
Joh When we break it down the whole chastity we find that in a good working relationship it is happen.
Than I ask myself why is a CB than necessary?
Perhaps in a BDSM style dom-sub relationship. The couple agree to be together with the dom having complete control over the sub, including locking her in a belt even though neither plans to stray from the relationship. It is just a thing they do that attracts them both.
I think it should be considered as chastity,yes.
Avery My brothers for example.
It's surprising.
Mine have no problem if his girlfriend masturbates.
Angelina i have to change my comment because @strictfather ather voted for it
It would be good if he give some news.
Angelina it is still impressive how clearly the roles are distributed here in the forum.
It is not surprising the most votes are "Not married (but still using chastity)" in a forum named unwed chastity,however.
Angelina would i still be chaste by this definition
Yes,but not in chastity.
I agree.
And i think a big part of customers of chastity belts use it this way(less than fetishists who use it as a game,however).
- Edited
Vanessa It would be good if he give some news.
yes, his last update was not very pleasant and he didn't write anything anymore.
Vanessa It is not surprising the most votes are "Not married (but still using chastity)" in a forum named unwed chastity,however.
yes, you are kind of right 
Vanessa Yes,but not in chastity.
the definitions are getting really complicated
Avery One more idea I had is to give a guy nude pictures of oneself which he could use to masturbate to, thus decreasing his demands for actual sex and help the girl remain chaste.
the idea is not bad 
Avery Perhaps in a BDSM style dom-sub relationship. The couple agree to be together with the dom having complete control over the sub, including locking her in a belt even though neither plans to stray from the relationship. It is just a thing they do that attracts them both.
It is a very, very, VERY big difference between not having orgasms because you promised it to your partner without a chastity belt or to simply not be able to have an orgasm because you wear a chastity belt for him. It doesn't have much to do with trust. In both scenario a lot of trust in both directions is mandatory, but the feeling of being locked is a very powerful feeling.
Vanessa Mine have no problem if his girlfriend masturbates.
I have no problem when Daniel masturbates, too. I often help him with this 
Avery On the other hand if one wants ones lover, male or female, to be happy and they enjoy masturbation then mayhap one should let them go ahead.
For me it is an important part of the dynamic, that he not only can have orgasms whenever he wants, but that he really has them, while I stay locked and without orgasms for him. We can both completely focus on his pleasure and this feels very romantic and satisfying for me.
Avery One more idea I had is to give a guy nude pictures of oneself which he could use to masturbate to, thus decreasing his demands for actual sex and help the girl remain chaste.
I can give him oral and stay in chastity.
Sara2001 For me it is an important part of the dynamic, that he not only can have orgasms whenever he wants, but that he really has them, while I stay locked and without orgasms for him.
I want the orgasms just with him only.
Edit - I'm so not normal now like with the other posts here I was thinking about how it would go with dating and marrying and I'm thinking crazy things 
Avery thus decreasing his demands for actual sex and help the girl remain chaste.
Is this before marriage? I'll be happy to help him out I'm keeping myself special not him.
After? Nono I'll have catching up to do
Joh Than I ask myself why is a CB than necessary? Because of the key holder has a trust problem!
Or it is the wearer not trusting themself?
Avery With my brothers it's a macho thing, the guy should be enough.
It's not about him being enough it's like creating something and choosing he is always a part of it.
Sara2001 It is a very, very, VERY big difference between not having orgasms because you promised it to your partner without a chastity belt or to simply not be able to have an orgasm because you wear a chastity belt for him. It doesn't have much to do with trust. In both scenario a lot of trust in both directions is mandatory, but the feeling of being locked is a very powerful feeling.
No doubt. I've never been locked by a lover, and it would have to be someone I loved, but it might be interesting to try at some point. Most of the guys I have been attracted to wanted you to want them and be exclusive because they were them, not because there was some arrangement. It's kind of an ego thing with them and I wanted to give myself to them on those terms. The most power I've given someone over me is tieing me up and letting them do me. For me that's powerful. Maybe someday I'll try being locked and feel what that feels like.
Sara2001 For me it is an important part of the dynamic, that he not only can have orgasms whenever he wants, but that he really has them, while I stay locked and without orgasms for him. We can both completely focus on his pleasure and this feels very romantic and satisfying for me.
An outstanding dynamic.
Sara2001 I can give him oral and stay in chastity.
Right now I'm trying to avoid that. The picture idea is easy. There are lots of bikini photos out there of me. Scrunch up against a door jamb, take off the bikini, cover your boob with your upper arm and presto a nude pic that shows little more of your bum than a standard bikini and he should be happy.
Jen Is this before marriage? I'll be happy to help him out I'm keeping myself special not him.
After? Nono I'll have catching up to do
It's an idea I got from a girl whose religion prohibits sexual conduct before marriage. For me it would be for someone I might be seeing but I know he's not the one I'm saving myself for. If he were that one I'd just give myself to him but this girl was taught not to do that.
Jen It's not about him being enough it's like creating something and choosing he is always a part of it.
I agree. My brothers are too egocentric, at least at this point.
Avery OK, I learned something.
It's not a fact,only my opinion!
Avery Maybe it's a difference between cultures here and across the pond. With my brothers it's a macho thing, the guy should be enough.
I'm pretty sure some men think the same here too.
I'm not sure a picture would be enough for a boyfriend...
Angelina the definitions are getting really complicated
Because we discuss of a lot of specific cases of semi-chastity!
Sara2001 I often help him with this
Sara2001 satisfying for me.
Do you think it would still be the case after you would have had sex,too?
Jen After? Nono I'll have catching up to do
Avery An outstanding dynamic
Yes, this is definitely not for everyone.
Avery Right now I'm trying to avoid that.
It gives me the opportunity to have a really intimate time with him.
Avery There are lots of bikini photos out there of me. Scrunch up against a door jamb, take off the bikini, cover your boob with your upper arm and presto a nude pic that shows little more of your bum than a standard bikini and he should be happy
I am not able to take this kind of photos, he could only see my chastity devices, but he would like to see them in place
Vanessa Do you think it would still be the case after you would have had sex,too?
I hope so 
, because this is how it will be after marriage, too. Except that in addition he will often play with my private parts up to the point where I could have an orgasm, but I will never be allowed to have the orgasm. It's called esging and I know from his sister how hot but frustrating this is. I am extremely curious about it. I think it's similar to the breast play he does with my breasts, just much more intense.
Of course only when it doesn't make me unhappy in the long term, but I think it will only make me horny and frustrated but very open to play with him.
Not fearing he put the picture on the net?
Sara2001 he could only see my chastity devices, but he would like to see them in place
Sara2001 this is how it will be after marriage, too.
I know,that's why I wonder if you still would feel satisfied after you know better feelings.
Edging can be fun,but if it leads to frustration only most of the time,it could easily became unpleasant and make you angry,I think.
Vanessa I know,that's why I wonder if you still would feel satisfied after you know better feelings.
Mr, too. I think I will learn from own experience. I am sure it will be difficult to not have orgasms once I have them again from time to time, the question is if it gives me more to stay orgasm free for him. I think I can only KNOW it from experience, but I think it will feel very good most of the time.
Vanessa Edging can be fun,but if it leads to frustration only most of the time,it could easily became unpleasant and make you angry,I think.
Angry? I expect that it will make me very frustrated, but why should I get angry? I will know that I will not get an orgasm from the very beginning of the edging, so I think it will not feel like I am tricked or something. I will get what I expect. Very frustrating from a sexual point of view, but very arousing at the same time, too. From my future sister in law I know that they have great fun together afterwards because she is full of sexual energy (of course without her having an orgasm).