Accidentally flashing chastity equipment in public
Sara2001 And of course both need to feel that the other one has your long term goals and happiness as his first priority
that is the most important thing, of course. however, i would never say that it reduces conflicts, but rather that it ensures that the conflicts become more solution-oriented, i.e. that it is worth entering into this conflict (of course objectively and with respect for the opinion of the other person).
But I think that's a bit small-minded from me now.
Joh Wow. To name it play thing is an understatement, in my opinion
![]()
Nevertheless you like it, do it.
We don't like to play with leadership and submission but we decided for true and real leadership based on love, honesty and trust and submission based on the same values.
Jen And hopefully even finding a solution to go to for a swim
We will see, I don't think it's very likely and it's not that extremely important for me.
Angelina that is the most important thing, of course. however, i would never say that it reduces conflicts, but rather that it ensures that the conflicts become more solution-oriented, i.e. that it is worth entering into this conflict (of course objectively and with respect for the opinion of the other person).
We think and made the experience that it's also possible to exchange opinions and to find a solution that is working for both of us without having a conflict. For us the key was to know the other ones points of view and of course it helps a lot that we have implemented the rule that he has to take care of my long term goals and happiness as the top priority while I have to take care of his short term wishes as the top priority. This way we have almost no conflicts and always a clear strategy how to solve them.
i'm almost jealous because it all sounds so well planned. you've managed to sort out pretty much everything without any major conflicts. i like planning too, but that's really impressive, but apparently also necessary for the kind of relationship you have.
sorry but at this point I agree with @Sara2001, for me BDSM is a game in the bedroom but not a real lifestyle.
BDSM is not a simple sex game. It can be a serious kind of relationship and it must not be disregarded as a play thing or a simple sexual act.
It can be also a relationship with different roles and behaviors.
Yes, there are people who do it as a simple sexual act which ends, but there are people who live it with the same commitment that people here invest in chastity.
Angelina
I am a fan of calling a spade a spade and not covering it up.
If you like it, what's the problem?
Who has the right to judge whether what you are doing is right or wrong when you can say for yourself it feels right?
The different names/abbreviations should help us only to understand what it means. Nothing more nothing less.
- Edited
LoonyMel BDSM is not a simple sex game. It can be a serious kind of relationship and it must not be disregarded as a play thing or a simple sexual act.
I thought it's called D/s or DD or TiH or TPE or something like this when it goes beyond sex play and become a 24/7 thing.
LoonyMel why stigmatize BDSM lifestyle so much?
I don't want to stigmatize this lifestyle, I just think/thought that when it becomes a 24/7 thing, it's more then BDSM. We would never even think about calling our relationship a BDSM relationship, but if anyone wants to call her/his lifestyle BDSM, that's perfectly fine for me, but I have no idea how the dynamic is working by this name. That's why from my experience other names are used like the names I mentioned above.
I think an important aspect is the question if pain is directly used to make it more sexy or to enforce the rules.
- Edited
Sara2001 D/s is a subset of BDSM, the part that deals more with hierarchy than with tying up or pain. The other terms you mentioned are pretty much ways in which a D/s relationship may work.
LoonyMel 3) why stigmatize BDSM lifestyle so much?
i don't, i just doubt it's a lifestyle. if it is, it's like @Sara2001, a male-led or in other cases female-led relationship. a sub/top relationship.
Joh The different names/abbreviations should help us only to understand what it means. Nothing more nothing less.
i admit that i am sometimes a bit small-minded, but i, for example, would imagine a BDSM relationship that involves one partner being led on a dog leash by the other partner all day long, even in public. that is certainly wrong, but i would associate it with that.
Sara2001 I just think/thought that when it becomes a 24/7 thing, it's more then BDSM
I agree with you, I think so too
Angelina i admit that i am sometimes a bit small-minded, but i, for example, would imagine a BDSM relationship that involves one partner being led on a dog leash by the other partner all day long, even in public. that is certainly wrong, but i would associate it with that.
As I said, it is only a description. A suitable example would be:
Class: Car
Including subclass: sports car, station car, bus, truck.
It is only a description to differentiate it and not to rank it.