Ines when someone pretends do it with a minor, that person is considering that small person as a sexual being
that would be true if the key holder was some strange adult, but in most cases here it is one's own parents, and it is usually about other things, usually you can sum it up as "good and decent daughter".
Joh The belt has an effect on your sexuality and with that you can not deny it.
of course the belt has an influence on sexuality, but in my opinion they are still two different things.
Angelina that would be true if the key holder was some strange adult, but in most cases here it is one's own parents
SInce most sexual abuse happens with close family members, I am afraid that is no excuse.
Ines Using a belt you are considering that the wearer has a developed sexuality
Or you are trying to be proactive instead of reactive, attempting to ensure they do not develop unwelcome habits so you do not have to break those habits later.
Of course, interfering with a person's sexual development is a precarious situation, and normalizing the idea that someone else controls your body before you really felt profound sexual desire in your life carries some seriously unfortunate implications, but if you look at it from the perspective of preserving your perfectly innocent angel, if you wait for their sexuality to be fully developed, it may be too late for that preservation.
youdontknowme Or you are trying to be proactive instead of reactive, attempting to ensure they do not develop unwelcome habits so you do not have to break those habits later.
Exactly the same, if someone is trying to avoid that, then is introducing the wearer in another dimension, it is not acceptable.
youdontknowme Of course, interfering with a person's sexual development is a precarious situation
Abuse.
youdontknowme but if you look at it from the perspective of preserving your perfectly innocent angel
From my perspective it is totally unacceptable.
youdontknowme if you wait for their sexuality to be fully developed, it may be too late for that preservation.
Much better arrive late, then
youdontknowme Of course, interfering with a person's sexual development is a precarious situation, and normalizing the idea that someone else controls your body before you really felt profound sexual desire in your life carries some seriously unfortunate implications, but if you look at it from the perspective of preserving your perfectly innocent angel, if you wait for their sexuality to be fully developed, it may be too late for that preservation.
If parents do this they over protect their children and let them no space to develop. They are called helicopter parents.
With this view, one could certainly justify the following action. If my child meets other children and is with them, he or she could be influenced in some way that I don't like. Just to be on the safe side, I don't let my child be with other children. I keep it only in our house/flat.
youdontknowme SInce most sexual abuse happens with close family members, I am afraid that is no excuse.
yes, that's frankly a shame, i admit i agree with you but can't say i understand it
Joh If parents do this they over protect their children and let them no space to develop. They are called helicopter parents.
that's a point i've also thought about with my father, but haven't come to a conclusion. there are areas where he gives me a lot of freedom and areas where he restricts me a lot. i think he sometimes projects his own bad experiences in life onto me and areas where he himself was also successful, he gives me a lot of freedom there.
