Ines In some cultures do not accept that a 13 years old child should not be sexualized.
you've written this here before, but i'm kind of bothered by the word "sexualised". a chastity belt prevents sexual pleasure, so it's more the opposite, at least for anyone who takes the chastity belt as something serious.
Joh Sorry, as the other sad already it is a private topic and it should stay private.
i agree , we could also talk about other forms of ceremonies, but they should all remain private 
Angelina
Well, It is clear that a girl wears a chastity belt for something. If a girl wears it is dilue she is considered as a sexual individual.
When you are so young, wearing a belt takes you to a dimension where you should not be.
I can understand a user does not have to be 30 years old, but sexualizing childhood is something that should not be echoed.
Ines I can understand a user does not have to be 30 years old, but sexualizing childhood is something that should not be echoed.
where I would ask again what you consider appropriate? 16?,17?,18+? 25.5489635?
probably, after almost 3 years in the belt, the word sexualize bothers me a lot, please don't be angry with me that I don't see the belt as something sexualizing (generally not). it has to do with sexuality but something sexualizing would be something that promotes sexuality in my opinion and the belt does not do that if the concept of chastity is taken seriously
Angelina 25.5489635
Nice number.
Angelina would be something that promotes sexuality in my opinion and the belt does not do that if the concept of chastity is taken seriously
A belt is a tool to avoid sexual contact of every nature, when someone pretends do it with a minor, that person is considering that small person as a sexual being, so... No in this forum.
Ines A belt is a tool to avoid sexual contact of every nature, when someone pretends do it with a minor, that person is considering that small person as a sexual being, so... No in this forum.
I wouldn't comment about age on the forum and definitely no child pornography and definitely no sexualization of chastity belts...
I would point out that women like me who wear from a young age do not struggle to masturbate and do not complain about feeling horny all the time. I would also remind you that chastity belts would probably be a lot better than FGM in those countries.
There is no reason to have minors on the forum especially since the loudest people who speak about chastity are people who are oversexed and want a break to make sex special again. Or are into BDSM.
The women who need help are quiet and timid and probably only one out of a thousand speaks up and their needs are drown out by people who own a chastity toy.
Ines when someone pretends do it with a minor, that person is considering that small person as a sexual being
that would be true if the key holder was some strange adult, but in most cases here it is one's own parents, and it is usually about other things, usually you can sum it up as "good and decent daughter".
Joh The belt has an effect on your sexuality and with that you can not deny it.
of course the belt has an influence on sexuality, but in my opinion they are still two different things.
Angelina that would be true if the key holder was some strange adult, but in most cases here it is one's own parents
SInce most sexual abuse happens with close family members, I am afraid that is no excuse.
Ines Using a belt you are considering that the wearer has a developed sexuality
Or you are trying to be proactive instead of reactive, attempting to ensure they do not develop unwelcome habits so you do not have to break those habits later.
Of course, interfering with a person's sexual development is a precarious situation, and normalizing the idea that someone else controls your body before you really felt profound sexual desire in your life carries some seriously unfortunate implications, but if you look at it from the perspective of preserving your perfectly innocent angel, if you wait for their sexuality to be fully developed, it may be too late for that preservation.
youdontknowme Or you are trying to be proactive instead of reactive, attempting to ensure they do not develop unwelcome habits so you do not have to break those habits later.
Exactly the same, if someone is trying to avoid that, then is introducing the wearer in another dimension, it is not acceptable.
youdontknowme Of course, interfering with a person's sexual development is a precarious situation
Abuse.
youdontknowme but if you look at it from the perspective of preserving your perfectly innocent angel
From my perspective it is totally unacceptable.
youdontknowme if you wait for their sexuality to be fully developed, it may be too late for that preservation.
Much better arrive late, then
youdontknowme Of course, interfering with a person's sexual development is a precarious situation, and normalizing the idea that someone else controls your body before you really felt profound sexual desire in your life carries some seriously unfortunate implications, but if you look at it from the perspective of preserving your perfectly innocent angel, if you wait for their sexuality to be fully developed, it may be too late for that preservation.
If parents do this they over protect their children and let them no space to develop. They are called helicopter parents.
With this view, one could certainly justify the following action. If my child meets other children and is with them, he or she could be influenced in some way that I don't like. Just to be on the safe side, I don't let my child be with other children. I keep it only in our house/flat.
youdontknowme SInce most sexual abuse happens with close family members, I am afraid that is no excuse.
yes, that's frankly a shame, i admit i agree with you but can't say i understand it
Joh If parents do this they over protect their children and let them no space to develop. They are called helicopter parents.
that's a point i've also thought about with my father, but haven't come to a conclusion. there are areas where he gives me a lot of freedom and areas where he restricts me a lot. i think he sometimes projects his own bad experiences in life onto me and areas where he himself was also successful, he gives me a lot of freedom there.
