Ines I think, that in most cases, parents think in "preservation" before than in "protection". They, in general, are not in panic about rapes, more well they are fear of girls bad steps before marrying.
Ines, your comment is very interesting.
I think that I will be called to develop this distinction (protection / preservation) during a future post. But for tonight I must admit that I am much too exhausted to be able to expose my ideas on the subject.
As long as it is consensual,I think too chastity can be used,and maybe even useful.I read a story,even if it was used not as it is intended,but still not as a fetish or a game,about a couple who used to both wear chastity devices during a part of the reviewing of the lessons for the partiels and during the exams to concentrate in studies,and not be distracted.Not sure at all it was true,but it is a good example of an useful and consensual use of a chastity belt.
And I agree with you,many people tend to think men would always like some things,and women would always like other things.Many people would feel strange a man who like to spend time decorating the house,or a woman who like to repair cars...
I think too.Often people would think he's gay,and,if a woman like masculine things,they would think she's lesbian.
i think there are too many prejudices today. a man who is gay can still be male and a woman who is lesbian can still be female 
Ines I think your approach even not totally wrong, in fact some girls here started to wear the belt as protection, I think the conceptualism of the girls as victims is not the main motivation under modern belting of the girls.
I think, that in most cases, parents think in "preservation" before than in "protection". They, in general, are not in panic about rapes, more well they are fear of girls bad steps before marrying.
Thanks to your post you have highlighted a subtle distinction but of capital importance.
Indeed, according to you, the main motivation of parents to wear the belt to girls would be to preserve their virginity rather than protect them against possible rape.
So if we push the argument a little further, it means that these same parents would feel less affected (or less distressed) if their daughter would lose her virginity against her acceptation (in case of rape) than if their daughter had lost his virginity by making love to a boy with all his heart.
And here I must admit that I am deeply revolted that some parents can think that way.
Indeed, in such a case, it is clear that it is the ego (or pride) of parents who prevails over the emotional security of their daughter.
It simply shows a deep selfishness on their part and I will never be convinced that such parents can act out of sincere love for their daughter.
In fact, it is not their daughter that protects but their own pride (their own vainness) and it shocked me deeply.
I consider that the primary mission of a parent is to protect his daughter from any external physical and psychological danger without affecting her consent or sexual fulfillment.
For my part that parents who sincerely love their daughters must put their physical and emotional safety above the honor or reputation of their daughter.
I think a good family man claiming sincerely loved his daughter, should invest in this kind of equipment:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyDBP2rp6DE
I honestly think it's a great invention to protect the girl against potential abusers while leaving her full of sexual freedom.
If for example the girl is a bit drunk during an alcoholic evening she can not be sexually abused against her will.
It's my educational philosophy.
Ines
Sorry Ines but I consider that the parents are selfish when they impose chastity on their daughter and that she does not adhere to this value.
In this case, the parents are selfish because they prefer to sacrifice the happiness of their daughter by making her unhappy rather than questioning an archaic and sexist principle of another age.
For me chastity imposed will always be regarded as an unacceptable intrusion of parents into the intimate life of their daughter.
In this case I say that it is a selfishness because a child can not be considered as a material property of his parents.
The child is being endowed with reason and he has to make his own life choices.
If parents impose lifes choices on their child, that is equals mental cloning.
In conclusion would you agree with this ?
To propose a course of action to one's child that one thinks is the best for him is an acceptable thing.
(we stay in education)
To impose this course of action against his intimate will is unacceptable (we are not in the field of education but in forced training)
I agree with you,but a lot of people don't understand it.
Angelina it is definitely something i would buy for my daughter, but nothing my father (or many other parents here) would accept
It can be useful,sometimes,yes.But my parents won't accept it instead of the chastity belt,too.
Angelina but when we are married I will think about it again
Would Camryn like it?And do you consider wearing one yourself,when married?
Ines In the field of chastity belt, there is only a worse thing: use a belt as punishment.
Forced permannet wearing is worse,in my opinion.
