Jeff

Even if not a willing wearer,I would try to answer it as I think it would work for one.

1.Yes with the belt on,supervised only if with the belt off.
2.Periods can be managed with the belt on.
3.I agree.Maybe keep the thigh bands on.
4.Not for fancy occasions,can be considered if going out and/or needing to wear clothes that would not cover the waist band.
5.Why not.Sunday or another day or night,once a week,can be good.
6.Depends on the sports,and if she do sports alone or in a team.
7.Of course.
8.Possible,but not necessary.
9.Yes for masturbation(or use a token),having sex should not be planned so much,in my opinion.
10.Why?Not necessary,nor useful,I think.

Renita

🤣

I agree!

Jeff

@Ines is a willing wearer,and her answers are probably based on her rules,so your opinion is not right for everyone.

Tobbe With so many options to avoid using the chastity belt, it is hardly nothing that protects against masturbation. More a fetisch.

A willingly wearer may want to wear it,but not be totally prevented to masturbate.It doesn't mean the wearer is a fetishist.

            Vanessa You've hung up on the word masturbating. My last sentence was a compilation on Jeff list and reading it, I think it will be more of a fetishist to follow it.

                  Vanessa so your opinion is not right for everyone.

                  that's right, that's what the forum is for, that we can exchange different opinions. otherwise it would be very boring here if we were always in agreement

                      a month later

                      Vanessa A willingly wearer may want to wear it,but not be totally prevented to masturbate.It doesn't mean the wearer is a fetishist.
                      Considering this, I am not a willingly wearer. And I think that now I am not a fetishist anymore.

                          While this thread is interesting is that we get to see how people think about wearing chastity devices, the whole concept of rules, as agreed to by a community of people, does seem a little silly.

                          If a person in a chastity belt keeps the keys then the "rules: are whatever that person wants and (can change constantly). So why bother? 🤣

                          If there is an interested and committed keyholder, then the rules are whatever they want them to be. Instead of "he who has the gold makes the rules" - it literally becomes "he who has the keys makes the rules" At that point the wearer becomes either willing, reluctant or unwilling.

                          I suppose the wearer then becomes deliriously happy, or unhappy or somewhere in between 🤣

                          Is there more? Am I missing something?

                            Foxies

                            Foxies the whole concept of rules, as agreed to by a community of people, does seem a little silly.

                            I agree, with you.... Mainly. But it is true that some elements are pretty universal in a "healthy" relationship. I think that here nobody intends in write "laws in stone".

                            Foxies If a person in a chastity belt keeps the keys then the "rules: are whatever that person wants and (can change constantly). So why bother?

                            Yes, she can be a girl with a chastity belt, but, of course is not a user in essence. I think that there are necessary 3 elements: belt, girl and key holder.

                            But, this is my opinion, no more.

                                    Verrouille Considering this, I am not a willingly wearer. And I think that now I am not a fetishist anymore.

                                    then you have an involuntary lifestyle ??? (sorry, the definitions are getting too exhausting 😂 ).

                                        Angelina
                                        I proposed to be belted, she accepted and now she makes the rules, including rules against my will (I dream about masturbating for example but it is out of question for her!), so I'm a little bit an unwillingly wearer I guess, no? So I think we can discuss about "ideal rules" but the reality is that the rules are those edicted by the keyholder.

                                            Verrouille

                                            that is why i always recommend that the rules should be clear beforehand and limited in time. then there is no reason to discuss changes within the time frame (except in an emergency).

                                                Ines

                                                I understand what you are saying, and I suppose there are as many views as there are people expressing them in this thread. For me, the entire raison d'etre is the dynamic that exists between me and my keyholder. I admit the only reason I am interested in the belt is my partner and the keys that she holds. If she refused to hold the keys or lost interest in why she holds them, I would ditch the belt in a heartbeat even if I had to cut my way out of it.

                                                • Ines replied to this.

                                                    Foxies
                                                    Yes. For me is identical. The axis is not the belt but the relationship and the feelings that my dependence arise on me.
                                                    If behind the belt there was not a keyholder that make us feel protected and safe, the belt would be only a piece of metal.

                                                      Verrouille

                                                      If it is willingly,there could be an agreement about possible releases,while using it seriously.Several of us here are using it seriously,but have releases.

                                                      Foxies If a person in a chastity belt keeps the keys

                                                      It is why wearing a chastity belt while keeping the keys is mainly useless.

                                                      Angelina

                                                      I agree.If rules have to be changed,these should be accepted again.

                                                              Vanessa It is why wearing a chastity belt while keeping the keys is mainly useless.

                                                              Hence why I wrote, "So why bother?"

                                                                Vanessa It is why wearing a chastity belt while keeping the keys is mainly useless.

                                                                right, i think a relationship with the key holder should always be there (even for involuntary ones like us)

                                                                    Vanessa

                                                                    1 point for you, I hadn't even thought of that 😉

                                                                    but an interesting thought 🤣

                                                                      5 months later