Jonas Yes indeed, I've raised this issue on here before. No-one ever asked me whether it was okay to be attached to demanding and behaviour-altering genitalia! Sexual freedom is simply considered to be correct and normal, despite the fact that it doesn't work out well for some of us.
That sounds dangerously close to a castration fantasy to me, and that is not a thought I would enjoy entertaining. As for considering sexual freedom normal, I think the world is better off with considering sexual autonomy a fundamental right, and consider it absolutely correct that forcing continuous chastity onto an unwilling participant is considered abusive. But just like free expression is a fundamental right in western civilization (especially for our American friends), the right is still managed by appropriateness (i.e. the classic "you can't yell fire in a crowded theatre" rule).
In our current society, the most notable instance of that are public indecency laws, but there are also places in the world with sodomy laws on the books, that restrict what two consenting adults can do with each other behind closed doors. Frankly, I think laws and customs that oppose, say, two men who love each other from sleeping with each other are a way bigger infringement on sexual autonomy than laws or customs mandating chastity devices in certain types of public places could ever be. As for the influence parental or educational authorities might have in a more chastity-oriented world, the older I get the less comfortable I feel about discussing that, but I think that done in moderation, it would not be worse than the homophobia, slut-shaming and similarly things that are sadly common experiences of contemporary youngsters.
Nate I agree with that, but then there's the question of what are you trying to protect and from whom. I managed to open the spare lock after about two hours of fiddling with two paperclips, so I went ahead and after a quick mail I ordered (hopefully) more secure ones from a local chastity-dedicated shop.
That is some dedication in probing for weaknesses. But I doubt you will find significant security upgrades in that form factor, I got a brand-name product from a reputable manufacturer and you see how that turned out. I reckon the only real difference between how easy they open is getting lucky with the pinning/bitting. Again, the depths are really darn close on mine. Pick-resistant locks will be much bulkier.
Nate About their use: wait, did you just say that a lock was used to lock a ... lock 🤣
As crazy as it sounds, yeah. This video shows the super-insecure type of door lock for which this style of lock is considered an upgrade: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=urcPnSBi3I4
Over time, they have been repurposed to secure power switches of dangerous machinery or trailer hitches, until the HolyTrainer company decided to turn that style of lock into the new generation of chastity cage lock. Also note that HolyTrainer-style cages are one of the more secure users of those locks - a lot of cheaper metal cages do not bother with putting a cover over the lock body, Which results in this hilarious little pick job: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uEYveSssok
