Single again chastity
- Edited
curious Do you define 'chastity' as not having sex or not having any orgasm at all (so no masturbation either)?
Somewhere in this forum I believe someone defined the difference for belts as 'abstinence belt' vs 'chastity belt'.
I still don't really understand this distinction. If you are free to masturbate then a partner is free to give you an orgasm in the same way (and often others). To me, non penetrative sex is still a form of sex.
Angelina . @Christine didn't wear the belt after she moved out, is there a comparable scenario with her mother?
I don't think so because wherever her mother goes, the rules follow her, ...because they are her rules!! 
Christine She already did. Otherwise she wouldn't wear it.
Is she happy with the way things have gone? Will you ask her to go 24/7 at some point? (As you were).
Christine I really care about her chastity now.
Renita You don't do the same.
If you care about chastity, then I think @Renita is right, you should at least consider living by the same rules.
Christine No I don't. I really care about her chastity now.
The one does not exclude the other. My father also takes care of my chastity very well, the question is why this chastity came into play? With your mother only because she kept you in the belt
Jonas If you are free to masturbate then a partner is free to give you an orgasm in the same way (and often others).
That is not true, let's assume that I "only" not allowed to have sex. I could then be alone in my bed and masturbate, but my partner couldn't be with me. Alone or with someone else is the decisive difference
Jonas I don't think so because wherever her mother goes, the rules follow her, ...because they are her rules!!
Well, the rules never seem to have been particularly clear, because it doesn't seem like it hadn't been a big problem for @Christine not to wear the belt after she has moved out
Jonas If you are free to masturbate then a partner is free to give you an orgasm in the same way (and often others
But you are not free to masturbate near your partner.
curious Do you define 'chastity' as not having sex or not having any orgasm at all (so no masturbation either)?
Former.
Jonas To me, non penetrative sex is still a form of sex.
To me, too. That's why she has the secondary shield.
Jonas Is she happy with the way things have gone?
I doubt.
Jonas Will you ask her to go 24/7 at some point?
No, it's not my goal.
Jonas you should at least consider living by the same rules.
I don't see a way now.
Angelina the question is why this chastity came into play?
Coz she was interested in chastity belts in the first place.
Belted girls rarely are once the key leaves their hands. And I’m sure she’d prefer to see you kept secure yourself.
So you technically don’t object to her masturbating, but it’s still not permitted while she’s belted.
You could always request to be given your belt back 
. As she has said, she’ll be happy to return it if it’s firmly locked in place!
Please forgive me, Christine, I do occasionally enjoy my fun at your expense!
- Edited
You'd just need to ask to wear your belt again as @Saintprudence says. Then do a mutual key exchange, or put both keys into the locker. You could even set up a pass code that each of you only knows half of!! 
Anyway, I think you see yourself as an external party applying your mother's own beliefs to her. But you also seem increasingly to share and agree with these beliefs! If you do end up thinking chastity is important, then the rules should apply to you too.
Thanks for answering all my questions. Sorry to be so nosy. Am fascinated by the switch-around that's taken place here.
Jonas You'd just need to ask to wear your belt again as @Saintprudence says.
Staying belted is the easiest thing in the world. Just step into it and close the lock. It’s everything else that’s hard!
Renita Christine's problem is that her mother has kept custody of her old chastity belt. She's told her that the only way she returns the belt to Christine's possession is around her waist and firmly locked. If she had time with the belt on her own, she might be able to alter it to escape. Her mother is wise not to allow her access to it. Even if she's not wearing it now, the day may come for it again.
Saintprudence
The difference is, that @Christine only wants to enforce no sex while her mother did not allow any masturbation either and kept her in complete chastity, not only sexual abstinence.
Saintprudence Staying belted is the easiest thing in the world. Just step into it and close the lock. It’s everything else that’s hard!
hihi, that's even true, only the time afterwards is difficult 
curious The difference is, that @Christine only wants to enforce no sex while her mother did not allow any masturbation either and kept her in complete chastity, not only sexual abstinence.
right and i wonder if @Christine would agree to wear the belt again for reasons of fairness if the mother "only" does not allow sex but does allow masturbation
Saintprudence She's told her that the only way she returns the belt to Christine's possession is around her waist and firmly locked.
Does she still require it?
Angelina if the mother "only" does not allow sex but does allow masturbation
I don't think that's gonna happen. Her mother seemed very firm about not permitting any orgasms, not just as a side effect of the belt but as one of the main purposes. So once @Christine is belted again, it probably means complete chastity.
I am more surprised, that Christine is not enforcing the same rule for her mother but rather limits the belt to the no sex aspect.
Renita last time Christine spoke of it, yes. Her mother does not want her to have access to the belt so she can’t interfere with the lock. Which is logical. The belt is not Christine’s property. It belongs to the keyholder, her mother, and if Christine wants it, it should be properly locked on.
curious I am more surprised, that Christine is not enforcing the same rule for her mother but rather limits the belt to the no sex aspect.
probably the mother would have refused otherwise and i think if @Christine had the same rules for herself then maybe she would be willing to accept a belt herself. i think no matter what, the rules should be the same for both of them
Angelina i think no matter what, the rules should be the same for both of them
Well her mother has set the rules in the first place, so that would mean @Christine would have to alter her position and keep her mother orgasm-free no matter if the mother complains about this. Not sure if that would work out given the dynamic between parent and child.
Saintprudence And I’m sure she’d prefer to see you kept secure yourself.
Yes, she would. As usual.
Saintprudence but it’s still not permitted while she’s belted
But permitted while she is not.
Jonas Then do a mutual key exchange
Mutual keyholding wouldn't work.
curious that @Christine only wants to enforce no sex while her mother did not allow any masturbation either and kept her in complete chastity
Right.
Angelina if @Christine would agree to wear the belt again for reasons of fairness
No such reason for me.
Renita Does she still require it?
Yes.
Saintprudence Her mother does not want her to have access to the belt so she can’t interfere with the lock.
She could order her own.