Single again chastity

Christine No I don't. I really care about her chastity now.

The one does not exclude the other. My father also takes care of my chastity very well, the question is why this chastity came into play? With your mother only because she kept you in the belt

Jonas If you are free to masturbate then a partner is free to give you an orgasm in the same way (and often others).

That is not true, let's assume that I "only" not allowed to have sex. I could then be alone in my bed and masturbate, but my partner couldn't be with me. Alone or with someone else is the decisive difference

Jonas I don't think so because wherever her mother goes, the rules follow her, ...because they are her rules!!

Well, the rules never seem to have been particularly clear, because it doesn't seem like it hadn't been a big problem for @Christine not to wear the belt after she has moved out

Christine It might be an option.

What's your plan?

Jonas If you are free to masturbate then a partner is free to give you an orgasm in the same way (and often others

But you are not free to masturbate near your partner.

curious Do you define 'chastity' as not having sex or not having any orgasm at all (so no masturbation either)?

Former.

Jonas To me, non penetrative sex is still a form of sex.

To me, too. That's why she has the secondary shield.

Jonas Is she happy with the way things have gone?

I doubt.

Jonas Will you ask her to go 24/7 at some point?

No, it's not my goal.

Jonas you should at least consider living by the same rules.

I don't see a way now.

Angelina the question is why this chastity came into play?

Coz she was interested in chastity belts in the first place.

Christine Jonas Is she happy with the way things have gone?

I doubt

Belted girls rarely are once the key leaves their hands. And I’m sure she’d prefer to see you kept secure yourself.

Christine curious Do you define 'chastity' as not having sex or not having any orgasm at all (so no masturbation either)?

Former.

Jonas To me, non penetrative sex is still a form of sex.

To me, too. That's why she has the secondary shield.

So you technically don’t object to her masturbating, but it’s still not permitted while she’s belted.

Christine Jonas you should at least consider living by the same rules.

I don't see a way now.

You could always request to be given your belt back . As she has said, she’ll be happy to return it if it’s firmly locked in place!

Please forgive me, Christine, I do occasionally enjoy my fun at your expense!

Jonas You'd just need to ask to wear your belt again as @Saintprudence says.

Staying belted is the easiest thing in the world. Just step into it and close the lock. It’s everything else that’s hard!

Christine I don't see a way now

Leave your keys in that "chastity safe".

Renita Christine's problem is that her mother has kept custody of her old chastity belt. She's told her that the only way she returns the belt to Christine's possession is around her waist and firmly locked. If she had time with the belt on her own, she might be able to alter it to escape. Her mother is wise not to allow her access to it. Even if she's not wearing it now, the day may come for it again.

Saintprudence
The difference is, that @Christine only wants to enforce no sex while her mother did not allow any masturbation either and kept her in complete chastity, not only sexual abstinence.

Saintprudence She's told her that the only way she returns the belt to Christine's possession is around her waist and firmly locked.

Does she still require it?

Angelina if the mother "only" does not allow sex but does allow masturbation

I don't think that's gonna happen. Her mother seemed very firm about not permitting any orgasms, not just as a side effect of the belt but as one of the main purposes. So once @Christine is belted again, it probably means complete chastity.
I am more surprised, that Christine is not enforcing the same rule for her mother but rather limits the belt to the no sex aspect.

Renita last time Christine spoke of it, yes. Her mother does not want her to have access to the belt so she can’t interfere with the lock. Which is logical. The belt is not Christine’s property. It belongs to the keyholder, her mother, and if Christine wants it, it should be properly locked on.

curious I am more surprised, that Christine is not enforcing the same rule for her mother but rather limits the belt to the no sex aspect.

probably the mother would have refused otherwise and i think if @Christine had the same rules for herself then maybe she would be willing to accept a belt herself. i think no matter what, the rules should be the same for both of them

Angelina i think no matter what, the rules should be the same for both of them

Well her mother has set the rules in the first place, so that would mean @Christine would have to alter her position and keep her mother orgasm-free no matter if the mother complains about this. Not sure if that would work out given the dynamic between parent and child.

Saintprudence And I’m sure she’d prefer to see you kept secure yourself.

Yes, she would. As usual.

Saintprudence but it’s still not permitted while she’s belted

But permitted while she is not.

Jonas Then do a mutual key exchange

Mutual keyholding wouldn't work.

curious that @Christine only wants to enforce no sex while her mother did not allow any masturbation either and kept her in complete chastity

Right.

Angelina if @Christine would agree to wear the belt again for reasons of fairness

No such reason for me.

Renita Does she still require it?

Yes.

Saintprudence Her mother does not want her to have access to the belt so she can’t interfere with the lock.

She could order her own.

Renita I’m having a hard time imagining Christine ordering a belt to place around her own waist after all that time stuck in her mother’s belt and trying to get free!

curious

or both wear the belt "only" to prevent sex. just because the mother set the rules first, it doesn't mean that both couldn't also live by @Christine's rules.

Christine Mutual keyholding wouldn't work.

may i ask why it would not work?