Been gone a while
youdontknowme I would even doubt most of the supervised showers mentioned on this forum involve someone constantly staring at the person in the shower,
of course not, in most cases my father sits on the toilet lid and looks more at his smartphone than at me. it's not like being in prison
of course i understand you, i have learned a lot about voluntary chastity here and of course i understand what it means to be sexually frustrated. i think the important thing is that you don't forget the big goal and that your wife supports you. 
that sounds good, very good even. you see, you don't have to worry too much. i am really happy for both of you.
youdontknowme Maybe it is not you who ends up with the key, but your future husband.
The key would indeed make an amazing wedding gift, but not from his mother, from @Funguy to his husband.
Or, I forget, does your bf already know your mother's reasons? I figured it would be more of a three-way meeting between the mother, the wearer and the partner where they make that decision together, some time during wedding preparations. In a fictional world where chastity is more commonplace, I might imagine the key being handed along with the rings from the parents to the best man to the wearer and finally to their partner, but that would be kind of impractical in reality, where most of the wedding party is unlikely to know about your chastity arrangement.
Jonas Serious use is one of the things that make this forum unique.
I think so,too.
Jonas the quicker you stop fighting it.
I still fight mine a lot...
Jonas Nothing worse than a belt that keeps orgasm out of reach but seemingly attainable.
More frustrating,yes.
Jonas That's where internet filters come in. I can and will have to ask my wife for limits to be set on this website. The topic just interests me too much. Lol.
How long would you be allowed?
Angelina right, mostly it is a form of stubbornness, but no ill will
I agree.
youdontknowme that is why I like chastity devices as a sort of "are you sure" prompt.
Only if you are your own keyholder.
Mainly to be sure I don't cheat during it.
youdontknowme I do not think that, outside of fetish couples, anyone is supervising showers for the viewer's gratification.
I agree.
youdontknowme I would even doubt most of the supervised showers mentioned on this forum involve someone constantly staring at the person in the shower, more like staying in the room and casting a quick glance at unpredictable interviews to make sure nobody is abusing their hygiene break.
Yes,even if more watched when I shower/dry the part which are generally under my chastity belt...
Good it went well!
It is similar to the "approval talk" with my parents when I wanted to date a potential boyfriend/girlfriend,except they told me if they approved him/her only after he/she left.
Jonas Chastity is sexy!!
Funguy now I know that I’ll get the key once I’m married.
Good to be sure of it,now.
youdontknowme Maybe it is not you who ends up with the key, but your future husband.
It would not be bad.
I would find somehow romantic,if,at my wedding,Emilie get the key to my chastity belt,and I get the key to Emilie's chastity belt(we plan to both wear it during our wedding).
If he does get the key I’m sure the belt will come off very fast, but I’m not against having it as a toy but I don’t think I’ll go into long term wear anytime soon
If he knows you are such a compulsive masturbator that you need a chastity belt to keep you in check, who is to say it will not go back on as fast as it came off 
. Especially if he seems to find your belt quite hot, he might enjoy being your only source of relief.
That said, that would not be for him alone to decide, such things need to be consensual. But considering you are kept belted until you marry, he seems to have the better bargaining position.
I think either way it is a (symbolic) transfer of power to his husband. If they want an equal relationship, I'm not sure that such a symbolic gesture is quite fitting on their wedding day, even though it would be a romantic one. (Unless the boyfriend also wears a chastity device for the wedding, and the exchange of keys is mutual, like Vanessa is considering.)
Vanessa It is similar to the "approval talk" with my parents when I wanted to date a potential boyfriend/girlfriend,except they told me if they approved him/her only after he/she left.
why only after he/she has left? i think it is better if the potential partner is still there in case there are misunderstandings that can easily be cleared up
Vanessa I would find somehow romantic,if,at my wedding,Emilie get the key to my chastity belt,and I get the key to Emilie's chastity belt(we plan to both wear it during our wedding).
that sounds very romantic but before you ask no, that is no longer possible for us, we have sold camryn's belt in the meantime. 
Jonas A half hour I guess, but that would be for all social media.
not much, when I think about how much you write here alone
Laura But since you have a partner now it doesn't make sense anymore
why? he can still masturbate. i have a different opinion, but i wouldn't say that it should be forbidden in general.
Angelina that sounds very romantic
As a fan of the idea of mutual chastity relationships, I definitely approve of that as well.
carg I think either way it is a (symbolic) transfer of power to his husband. If they want an equal relationship, I'm not sure that such a symbolic gesture is quite fitting on their wedding day, even though it would be a romantic one.
Yeah, the fact that it might cement an inequality may be a concern.
- Edited
Angelina not much, when I think about how much you write here alone
Lol.
When I look at my new turbo-charged and productive schedule I find that there are just not enough hours in the day to allocate more time to social contact. Will half an hour be enough? I dunno, only time will tell...
youdontknowme As a fan of the idea of mutual chastity relationships,
What aspects of mutual chastity do you approve of may I ask?
Jonas Mostly how it involves chastity in a couple's dynamic without creating a hierarchy. Dom/sub relationships with the submissive locked and the dominant free are all pretty much everywhere in the more fetishistic chastity communities, but mutual chastity arrangements are quite different from that. They retain the whole "physically secured monogamy" aspect, but they subvert the expectation that a keyholder always exerts some form of power over a wearer.